As
valuable as the island and its fishing was, the British government long
discouraged permanent settlement on the island, preferring instead a mainly
migratory population that followed the fishing trade. The fishing trade was
estimated to be worth about £600,000 per year. The island’s position on the
globe also meant that’s its ports offered safe harbor during Atlantic
crossings.
Fishing was a little different then |
The impact of the troubles in the
thirteen American colonies was felt in Newfoundland before the actual fighting
broke out. As mentioned before Newfoundland had a largely migratory population
and needed to be provisioned from elsewhere. Boston became the primary supplier
of provisions to Newfoundland and acted as a middleman in the trade of fish
with the West Indies. Fisherman sent fish south and rum and molasses made their
way north.
Following the imposition Intolerable
Acts of 1774, which shut down the port of Boston and imposed many other
limitations on trade in the colonies in response to the Boston Tea Party and
other troubles, the colonies declared an embargo on trade with the British.
This included Newfoundland. When the fishing fleets arrived that summer, they
found no supply of bread and flout to keep them fed. What had not arrived from
the colonies could not be replaced from England or from Quebec although attempts
were made.
With the outbreak of the shooting war in
1775 the food shortage did not improve. The price of flour and bread tripled,
people went hungry and there were reports of some starving to death. This led
to more attempts at farming on the island and several people leaving their
small outports and heading for the larger population centers like St. Johns.
Many Americans saw the value of
disrupting the British fishery at Newfoundland. Only the lack of a navy of any
size prevented a full-on attack on the
island. Vice-Admiral John Montagu,
commander of the Newfoundland station, had only four ships and a few smaller
armed vessels to attempt to defend the coast, the Grand Banks fishing grounds
and to disrupt American shipping to Europe. This meant that American privateers
could wreak havoc almost at will. Most privateers were after the profit of
capturing a British merchant vessel so the small fishing ships were not
valuable targets in and of themselves but taking a fishing ship allowed
privateers to resupply their stocks of food, water, naval stores and in some
cases even men. They also began to attack the small outport villages on the
southern coast of Newfoundland.
Vice Admiral John Montagu |
The presence of American privateers
seriously cut into the fishing off Newfoundland. In addition, the threat of impressment
onto the British men of war stationed at Newfoundland or making an Atlantic
crossing gave even more incentive to fishermen to stay off the seas. For the
first time the resident population of Newfoundland exceeded the
migratory
population.[i]
Privateer |
The entrance of the French into the
war brought a whole new level of importance to Newfoundland. Shortly after receiving
news of the new alliance in 1778, Admiral Montagu took his small force and
conquered St. Pierre and Miquelon. The islands had no defenses and were of
little value but it really was a thumb in the eye to the French. This led Count
D’Estaing to write to George Washington that he had heard the islands had been
ravaged and that “We hope that with your assistance the day will come, when
France shall partake the Cod-fishery with other nations.”[ii]
Benjamin Franklin also caught on to
the French interest in Newfoundland. On February 25, 1779, he suggested an
attack on Nova Scotia and Newfoundland say “Halifax being reduced, the small
forts of Newfoundland would easily follow…” He also stated that the fishery was
a source of money for the British and “a great Nursery of Seamen.” A place
where the British could man their naval vessels with experienced sailors.[iii]
When the English government finally
got serious about negotiating a peace treaty to end the war the rights to fish
around Newfoundland were not only incredibly important to the Americans, but a
major sticking point for the British. On January 7, 1782, Robert R. Livingston,
who had the unenviable task, as Secretary of Foreign Affairs, of trying to
supervise the peace negotiations in Paris
from Philadelphia wrote to negotiator
Benjamin Franklin; “The fisheries will probably be a source of Litigation, not
because our rights are doubtfull, but because Great Britain has never paid much
attention to rights which interfere with her Views.”
Just when you were wondering what this blog had to do with anything |
He
went on to explain more fully:
The Arguments of which
the People of America found their claim to fish on the Banks of Newfoundland,
arise first from their having once formed a part of the British Empire, in
which State they allways enjoyed as fully as the People of Britain themselves,
the right of fishing on those banks. They have shared in all the Wars for the
extension of that right, and Britain could with no more justice have excluded
them from the Enjoyment of it (even supposing that one Nation could possess it
to the exclusion of an other) while they formed a part of that Empire, than
they could exclude the People of London or Bristol. If so the only enquiry is
how have we lost this right, if we were Tenants in Common with Great Britain
while United with her, we still continue so, unless by our own Act we have
relinquished our Title. Had we parted with mutual Consent, we should doubtless
have made partition of our common Rights by Treaty. But the oppressions of
Great Britain forced us to a seperation, (which must be admitted, or we have no
right to be independant) it cannot certainly be contended that those
oppressions abridged our Rights or gave new ones to Britain, our rights then
are not invalidated by this seperation, more particularly as we have kept up
our Claim from the commencement of the War, and assigned the attempt of Great
Britain to exclude us from the fisheries as one of the causes of our recurring
to Arms.
The second Ground upon
which we place our right to fish on the Banks of Newfoundland provided we do not
come within such distance of the coasts of other powers as the law of Nations
allows them to appropriate, is the right which Nature gives to all Mankind to
use its common Benefits, so far as not to exclude others. The Sea cannot in its
nature be appropriated. No Nation can put its mark upon it, Tho’ attempts have
sometimes been made to set up an Empire over it, they have been considered as
unjust usurpations, and resisted as such in turn by every Maritime Nation in
Europe.[iv]
Interestingly,
in November of 1782, John Adams used a nearly identical
argument during a
negotiation session with British agents. As he recounted in his diary:
John Adams and his "original" ideas |
When
God Almighty made the Banks of Newfoundland at 300 Leagues Distance from the
People of America and at 600 Leagues distance from those of France and England,
did he not give as good a Right to the former as to the latter. If Heaven in
the Creation gave a Right, it is ours at least as much as yours. If Occupation,
Use, and Possession give a Right, We have it as clearly as you. If War and
Blood and Treasure give a Right, ours is as good as yours. We have been
constantly fighting in Canada, Cape Breton and Nova Scotia for the Defense of
this Fishery, and have expended beyond all Proportion more than you. If then
the Right cannot be denied, Why should it not be acknowledged? and put out of
Dispute? Why should We leave Room for illiterate Fishermen to wrangle and
chicane? [v]
It
seems reasonable that Adams may have seen Livingston’s letter to Franklin at
some point but the terrible relationship between the two men would never have
allowed Adams to give any credit to Livingston for the ideas.
Ultimately the Treaty of Paris was
finalized in 1783 and signed. It consisted of ten articles. The first was
America independence from Great Britain. The second defined the borders of the
new United States. The third reads thusly:
It is agreed that the
People of the United States shall continue to enjoy unmolested the Right to
take Fish of every kind on the Grand Bank and on all the other Banks of Newfoundland,
also in the Gulph of St. Lawrence and at all other Places in the Sea where the
Inhabitants of both Countries used at any time heretofore to fish. And also
that the Inhabitants of the United States shall have Liberty to take Fish of
every kind on such Part of the Coast of Newfoundland as British Fishermen shall
use, (but not to dry or cure the same on that Island) and also on the Coasts
Bays & Creeks of all other of his Britannic Majestys Dominions in America,
and that the American Fishermen shall have Liberty to dry & cure Fish in
any of the unsettled Bays Harbours and Creeks of Nova-Scotia, Magdalen Islands,
and Labrador, so long as the same shall remain unsettled, but so soon as the
same or either of them shall be settled, it shall not be lawful for the sd:
Fishermen to dry or cure Fish at such Settlement, without a previous Agreement
for that purpose with the Inhabitants, Proprietors or Possessors of the Ground.[vi]
After independence, a
share of the fishing trade was considered one of the most important objectives
of the American negotiators. Its not until the 7th article that they
actually get around to ending hostility and stopping the war.
It was all about this beautiful, majestic, delicious creature |
The importance of Newfoundland to America cannot be
overstated. The territory would flare up again during the quasi-war with France
at the end of the 18th century. In the 19th century
fisherman from all over the east coast, including the City of Hudson would sail
for the Grand Banks. At the beginning of World War II Franklin Delano Roosevelt
traded a bunch of broken down destroyers to the British for the rights to put a
base on Newfoundland. The base ended up operating throughout the war and the
rest of the 20th century, only being scaled down in the 1990’s. It
seems that this rocky island has inextricably connected to the fate of the
United States.
[i]
Much of this information come from several ariticles by Olaf Janzen publish on www.heritage.nf.ca and to Olaf Janzen’s
article JANZEN, OLAF. "The Royal Navy and the
Defence of Newfoundland during the American Revolution." Acadiensis 14, no. 1 (1984): 28-48. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30303382.
[ii] “To George Washington from
Vice Admiral d’Estaing, 6 October 1778,” Founders
Online, National Archives,
last modified June 13, 2018,
http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-17-02-0295. [Original
source: The Papers of George
Washington, Revolutionary War Series, vol. 17, 15 September–31 October 1778,
ed. Philander D. Chase. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2008,
pp. 279–280.]
[iii] “From Benjamin Franklin to
Vergennes: Two Letters, 25 February 1779,” Founders
Online, National Archives,
last modified June 13, 2018,
http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-28-02-0515. [Original
source: The Papers of Benjamin
Franklin, vol. 28, November 1, 1778, through February
28, 1779, ed. Barbara B. Oberg. New Haven and London: Yale University
Press, 1990, pp. 603–607.]
[iv] “To Benjamin Franklin from
Robert R. Livingston, 7 January 1782,” Founders
Online, National Archives,
last modified June 13, 2018,
http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-36-02-0267. [Original
source: The Papers of Benjamin
Franklin, vol. 36, November 1, 1781, through March 15,
1782, ed. Ellen R. Cohn. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001,
pp. 390–402.]
[v] “1782 November 29. Fryday.,” Founders Online, National Archives, last modified
June 13, 2018,
http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/01-03-02-0001-0004-0023. [Original
source: The Adams Papers,
Diary and Autobiography of John Adams, vol. 3, Diary, 1782–1804; Autobiography,
Part One to October 1776, ed. L. H. Butterfield. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1961, pp. 79–81.]
[vi] “Definitive Treaty of Peace
between the United States and Great Britain, 3 September 1783,” Founders Online, National Archives, last modified
June 13, 2018, http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-40-02-0356.
[Original source: The Papers
of Benjamin Franklin, vol.
40, May 16 through September
15, 1783, ed. Ellen R. Cohn. New Haven and London: Yale University Press,
2011, pp. 566–575.]